Weiss v. Max , 136 N.J. Eq. 100 ( 1945 )

Per Curiam.

The appellant brings this appeal because her bill to impose a trust in her favor was dismissed on grounds stated in the opinion below, and also because of lack of proof to sustain the contentions. A careful examination of the record and briefs satisfies us that the decree should be affirmed.

The decree is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Pbrskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Rae-, eerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversed — None.