E. M. Land Co. v. Bd. Adjustment, Newark , 103 N.J.L. 487 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — if one.