Berglund v. Hild , 103 N.J.L. 696 ( 1927 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hone.