-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Hone.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 137 A. 916, 103 N.J.L. 697, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 249
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Filed Date: 5/16/1927
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024