O'Neill v. General Casualty and Surety Company , 103 N.J.L. 704 ( 1927 )

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.