Okin v. Essex Sales Company , 104 N.J.L. 181 ( 1927 )

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Paekeb, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacii, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yak Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.