Ganley v. Kalikman ( 1930 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Yan Buskirk, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.