In re the Disciplinary Hearing of Bynes ( 1995 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 284 N.J.Super. 489, 665 A.2d 1112 (1994).

    For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

    Opposed — None.

Document Info

Filed Date: 10/25/1995

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024