-
PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 284 N.J.Super. 489, 665 A.2d 1112 (1994).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Document Info
Filed Date: 10/25/1995
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024