Karam v. State , 157 N.J. 187 ( 1999 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 308 N.J.Super. 225, 705 A.2d 1221 (1998).

    For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 7.

    Opposed — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 157 N.J. 187, 723 A.2d 943, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 56

Filed Date: 2/24/1999

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024