Headly v. Van Ness ( 1810 )


Menu:
  • By the Court.

    — This is too loose a paper to be treated as a negociable instrument. The right of Van Ness, the plaintiif below, to maintain this action against Headly, no way appears by the record of the justice. The state of demand is in itself absurd and unintelligible; nor will the paper admitted in evidence, help it out.

    Judgment reversed.

Document Info

Filed Date: 11/15/1810

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024