-
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmamcc — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Heppenheimer, Williams, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Wi-iite, J. 1.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 97 N.J.L. 560, 117 A. 596, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 235
Judges: Pee
Filed Date: 6/19/1922
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024