-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere, ip the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenohard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 97 N.J.L. 564, 12 Gummere 564, 117 A. 925, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 238
Filed Date: 6/19/1922
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024