-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, ■ Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Min turn, Kalisch, White, Heppbnheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bttskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — ISTone.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 97 N.J.L. 567, 117 A. 926, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 240
Filed Date: 4/28/1922
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024