-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 97 N.J.L. 568, 117 A. 926, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 241
Filed Date: 4/28/1922
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024