Johannsen v. Union Iron Works , 97 N.J.L. 569 ( 1922 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bergen, Minttjrn, Kaltsch, White, Heppenukimer, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.