Reimer v. Board of Chosen Freeholders , 97 N.J.L. 575 ( 1922 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Wiijte, Heppbnheimer, Williams, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.