Safner v. Gollin , 97 N.J.L. 576 ( 1922 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, CHiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimbr, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskikk, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.