State v. Lavine , 97 N.J.L. 583 ( 1922 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Tbenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimbr, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.