Cruikshank v. Cruickshank , 115 N.J. Eq. 322 ( 1934 )

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Matthews in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.