F. A. Cigol Rubber Co. v. Cigol , 93 N.J. Eq. 657 ( 1922 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated' in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery.

    For affirmance — -Trie Chibe-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bersbn, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenrieimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk — 15. For reversal — -None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 93 N.J. Eq. 657, 117 A. 146, 8 Stock. 657, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 345

Judges: Affirmance, Aokerson, Bersbn, Black, Buskirk, Chibe, Gardner, Heppenrieimer, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, White, Williams

Filed Date: 4/28/1922

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024