City of Ventnor v. Fulmer , 93 N.J. Eq. 660 ( 1922 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

    For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black,, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 14. For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 93 N.J. Eq. 660, 117 A. 925, 8 Stock. 660, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 346

Judges: Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Buskirk, Gardner, Iard, Kalisch, Katzenbaci, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenci, White, Williams

Filed Date: 4/28/1922

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024