Kenney v. King , 93 N.J. Eq. 688 ( 1922 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    We agree with the finding of facts by the vice-chancellor and the propriety of the deciee based on those facts. The decree is therefore affirmed. ■

    For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, B,lack, Katzenraoi-i,. White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14. .... For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 93 N.J. Eq. 688, 118 A. 634, 8 Stock. 688, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 352

Judges: Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Bus, Gardner, Heppenheimer, Katzenraoi, Kirk, Lack, Minturn, None, Parker, Reversal, Swayze, Trenohard, White, Williams

Filed Date: 6/20/1922

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024