Linnekogel v. Linnekogel , 10 Stock. 265 ( 1923 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bentley in the court of chancery.

    For affirmance■—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—9. For reversal—Minturn, Kaliscii, Heppeniibimer—3.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 95 N.J. Eq. 265, 10 Stock. 265, 122 A. 372, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 716

Judges: Ackerson, Affirmance, Bergen, Black, Buskirk, Heppeniibimer, Iiee, Kaliscii, Katzbnbaci, Minturn, Parker, Reversal, Trenciiard, White

Filed Date: 10/11/1923

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024