Eitner v. Eitner , 110 N.J. Eq. 659 ( 1932 )

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 107 N. J. Eq. 88.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskers:, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.