State ex rel. Randolph v. Wood , 50 N.J.L. 175 ( 1887 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court in its opinion.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Eeed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 10. For reversal — None.