Inhabitants of Eatontown v. Wolley , 50 N.J.L. 177 ( 1887 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Mague, Reed, Scuddee, Van Syckel, Beown, Clement, McGregor, Pateeson, Whitakee. 11. For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 50 N.J.L. 177, 17 A. 1103, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 1

Judges: Affirmance, Beown, Chancelloe, Clement, Mague, McGregor, None, Pateeson, Reed, Reversal, Scuddee, Syckel, Whitakee

Filed Date: 11/15/1887

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024