Waters v. Mayor of Newak ( 1894 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The judgment of the court below is affirmed for the reasons given by that court.

    For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Lippincott, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Green, Krueger, Sims, Smith. 11.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Filed Date: 11/15/1894

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024