-
Per Curiam. These eases were argued together, and they involve the same questions. The judgments are affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinions in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green. 9. For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers： 70 N.J.L. 824, 41 Vroom 824, 59 A. 1117, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 166
Judges： Affirmance, Bogert, Dixon, Garrison, Green, None, Pitney, Reversal, Swayze, Vredenburgi, Vroom
Filed Date： 11/14/1904
Precedential Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/11/2024