Larned v. Central Railroad ( 1911 )

Per Curiam.

We are content with the reasoning adopted by the Supreme Court in this case, but must not be understood as conceding that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the railroad company.

The judgment under review should be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Reed, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yre-DENBURGH, YrOOM, CONGDON, SULLIVAN, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.