State v. Swiller , 91 N.J.L. 345 ( 1917 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen; Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.