Duffy v. Mayor of Paterson , 90 N.J.L. 669 ( 1917 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Wilhelmina Koettegen v. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Paterson et al., No. 149 of the present, term of this court, post p. 698.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppeniibimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.