Albrecht v. Thieme , 98 N.J.L. 249 ( 1922 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justiee Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance— Vim Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimee, Williams, Gardner, Ackebson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 12.

For reversal — TJone.