-
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein' should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 98 N.J.L. 264, 118 A. 926, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 286
Filed Date: 10/6/1922
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024