Hemmendinger v. McGann Co. , 98 N.J.L. 265 ( 1922 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimeh, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.