Howard v. Commonwealth Beneficial Ass'n , 98 N.J.L. 267 ( 1922 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Williams, Gardner, A okerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Vone.