-
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbaeh in the Supreme Court.
For affirm,anee — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchabd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis ch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Bus-kirk, JJ. 18.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 98 N.J.L. 271, 118 A. 926, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 290
Judges: Pee
Filed Date: 10/6/1922
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/11/2024