Morley v. McDonald , 98 N.J.L. 275 ( 1922 )

Per Curiam.

. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalis oil, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimee, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.