Fort v. Reid Ice Cream Co. , 98 N.J.L. 559 ( 1923 )


Menu:
  • Pee Curiam.

    The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

    For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.

    For reversal — None.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 98 N.J.L. 559

Judges: Pee

Filed Date: 2/1/1923

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2022