Hardy v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad , 98 N.J.L. 564 ( 1923 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Tren chard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White,. Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.

Far reversal — None.