-
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 98 N.J.L. 566
Judges: Pee
Filed Date: 2/2/1923
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2022