Nusbaum v. H. G. Harris Co. , 98 N.J.L. 567 ( 1923 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalis ch, Black, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Kone.