-
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justic-t Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bekgen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Bus-kirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — JSTone.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 98 N.J.L. 569
Judges: Pee
Filed Date: 2/1/1923
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2022