Scheinman v. Bloch , 98 N.J.L. 571 ( 1923 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenhetmer, Williams, Gardner, Ackérson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.

For reversad — None.