Uslan v. Bowen , 112 N.J.L. 98 ( 1934 )

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.