Max v. Max ( 1940 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered'by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Bodine, Pbeskie, Deae, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Case, Hbhee, Wells, Hague, JJ. 4. '