Mellor v. Hartford, Inc. , 106 N.J.L. 574 ( 1929 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Kalisch, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskiek, McGlennon, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Paekee, Kays, JJ. 2.