Scott v. Hoboken Bank for Savings , 127 N.J.L. 564 ( 1942 )

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, He her, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.