IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF 500 BROADWAY, LLC, FOR Â DECLARATORY RULING UNDER N.J.S.A. 5:12-82.(CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION) ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                      NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
    APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
    This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court."
    Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the
    parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
    SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
    APPELLATE DIVISION
    DOCKET NO. A-2980-16T3
    IN THE MATTER OF THE
    PETITION OF 500 BROADWAY, LLC,
    FOR DECLARATORY RULING UNDER
    N.J.S.A. 5:12-82.
    _________________________________
    Submitted October 23, 2017 – Decided November 20, 2017
    Before Judges Sabatino and Whipple.
    On appeal from State of New Jersey, Casino
    Control Commission, PRN 2431601, Order No. 17-
    01-31-01.
    Cooper Levenson, PA, attorneys for appellant
    500 Broadway, LLC (Fredric L. Shenkman, on the
    briefs).
    Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General,
    attorney for respondent New Jersey Division
    Of Gaming Enforcement (David L. Rebuck,
    Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mary
    A. Carboni, Louis S. Rogacki and Tracy E.
    Richardson, Deputy Attorneys General, and Mary
    Jo Flaherty, Assistant Attorney General, on
    the brief).
    Dianna   W.   Fauntleroy,   General   Counsel,
    attorney for respondent New Jersey Casino
    Control Commission (Elizabeth F. Casey, Senior
    Counsel, of counsel and on the brief).
    PER CURIAM
    We were advised by the parties the property, which is the
    subject of this appeal, is under contract to be purchased by a
    third party.   Accordingly, the appeal is moot.   DeVesa v. Dorsey,
    
    134 N.J. 420
    , 428 (1993).   The appeal is hereby dismissed without
    prejudice and without costs.   If for some reason the sale does not
    transpire and the contract is rescinded or terminated, appellant
    may promptly file a motion to reopen the appeal.    Conversely, if
    the sale does occur and the third party buyer wishes to enter into
    a leasing arrangement that implicates licensure issues, the buyer
    shall present those issues in the first instance to the Casino
    Control Commission based on the specific facts relating to its own
    company and proposed lease.
    Dismissed.
    2                          A-2980-16T3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A-2980-16T3

Filed Date: 11/20/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021