JERMAINE VAUGHN VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS) ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                 NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
    APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
    This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the
    internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
    SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
    APPELLATE DIVISION
    DOCKET NO. A-2319-19
    JERMAINE VAUGHN,
    Appellant,
    v.
    NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT
    OF CORRECTIONS,
    Respondent.
    ___________________________
    Submitted October 12, 2021 – Decided November 1, 2021
    Before Judges Sabatino and Rothstadt.
    On appeal from the New Jersey Department of
    Corrections.
    Jermaine Vaughn, appellant pro se.
    Andrew J. Bruck, Acting Attorney General, attorney for
    respondent (Jane C. Schuster, Assistant Attorney
    General, of counsel; Stephanie D. Trotter, Deputy
    Attorney General, on the brief).
    PER CURIAM
    Appellant Jermaine Vaughn, a state prisoner, is serving a life sentence for
    murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3(b). As of the date of the appeal, he had served twenty-
    five years. He first becomes eligible for parole review in August 2026.
    Representing himself, Vaughn appeals from a December 31, 2019 final
    agency decision of the Department of Corrections denying his request for
    commutation time credits to thereby reduce his sentence. We affirm that denial.
    In certain appropriate circumstances, a state prisoner can earn
    commutation credits to reduce his sentence for “continuous orderly deportment”
    (i.e., good behavior) under N.J.S.A. 30:4-140, pursuant to the formula specified
    in that statute. As the Department's decision and its brief on appeal correctly
    point out, the basis for Vaughn's request for such commutation credits does not
    fit within these circumstances and therefore is legally untenable.
    N.J.S.A. 30:4-140 and its companion regulation, N.J.A.C. 10A:9-5.2,
    limit eligibility for commutation credits to sentences that have both a minimum
    and maximum term of years. A sentence to life in prison, such as the one
    imposed on Vaughn, has an indefinite terminus. The inmate so sentenced may
    be confined for the rest of his or her natural life. By its inherent nature, a life
    sentence has no minimum or maximum term of years.
    A-2319-19
    2
    We reject Vaughn's argument that he is entitled to commutation credits
    through the application of the No Early Release Act ("NERA"), N.J.S.A. 2C:43-
    7.2. Subsection (a) of NERA, as amended, prescribes that a defendant must
    serve eighty-five percent of the sentence imposed for certain enumerated first-
    degree and second-degree crimes before he or she may become eligible for
    parole. The enumerated crimes under NERA now include murder. See N.J.S.A.
    2C:43-7.2(d)(1).
    When, as here, a defendant receives a life sentence for an enumerated
    NERA offense, the 85% minimum parole ineligibility period for a life sentence
    is calculated by deeming the sentence to be seventy-five years. N.J.S.A. 2C:43-
    7.2(b). But this deemer provision within NERA is expressly limited to such
    parole eligibility calculations. Ibid. ("Solely for purposes of calculating the
    minimum term of parole ineligibility pursuant to subsection a of the section , a
    sentence of life imprisonment shall be deemed to be 75 years.") (emphasis
    added). Hence, NERA does not transform a life sentence into a minimum term
    of years for which commutation credits may be earned under N.J.S.A. 30:4-140.
    Affirmed.
    A-2319-19
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A-2319-19

Filed Date: 11/1/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/1/2021