State v. Harrison ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in
    the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the
    citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-
    generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
    Filing Date: May 26, 2022
    No. S-1-SC-37774
    STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
    Plaintiff-Respondent,
    v.
    JAMES HARRISON,
    Defendant-Petitioner.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI
    Karen L. Townsend, District Judge
    Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender
    Caitlin C.M. Smith, Assistant Appellate Defender
    Santa Fe, NM
    for Petitioner
    Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
    John Kloss, Assistant Attorney General
    Santa Fe, NM
    for Respondent
    DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
    VIGIL, Chief Justice.
    {1}     WHEREAS, the Court granted Defendant James Harrison’s petition for writ of
    certiorari to review the Court of Appeals determination that the district court erred in
    ruling that the blood test results at issue were inadmissible because the district court
    misapprehended State v. Adams, 
    2019-NMCA-043
    , 
    447 P.3d 1142
     and NMSA 1978,
    Section 66-8-103 (1978); and
    {2}    WHEREAS, the Court ordered that this case be held in abeyance pending the
    Court’s disposition of State v. Adams, 
    2022-NMSC-008
    , 
    503 P.3d 1130
    ; and
    {3}    WHEREAS, this Court issued an opinion in Adams, id.; and
    {4}   WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the issue of law presented in this case was
    addressed by the Court’s opinion in Adams, id.; and
    {5}   WHEREAS, the Court exercises its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)(1) NMRA to
    dispose of this case by nonprecedential order rather than a formal opinion;
    {6}   NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the memorandum opinion of the
    Court of Appeals is affirmed, and the matter is remanded to the district court for further
    proceedings in accordance with Adams, 
    2022-NMSC-008
    .
    {7}    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Justice
    C. SHANNON BACON, Justice
    DAVID K. THOMSON, Justice
    JULIE J. VARGAS, Justice
    BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Justice, not participating
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 5/26/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/26/2022